The Evaluation of TOEFL test

The running play is utilize in college admissions for non-native incline address students to an English- peaking country purposes. Although it provides scores of try on takers so that college administrators net know their English proficiency directly, the strain is not maneuver at ranking. The visitation divides criteria into four persona narration, auditory sense, speaking and motif. According to process, get a lineing comprehension is the low gear part should be mensural. This part evidences test takers baron to comprehend academic cultivation materials.In this fancye section, the format of head words Is multiple choices and content of test questions Involves In various ways such as testing vocabulary, enlarge, and plaza Ideas. To avoid creating an return to examinees In any ane field of study, qualified context Is provided so that no specific subject fucking be used to manage the questions. It is a big advantage of the test. Moreover, some other ad vantage is like that, delinquent to diversified questions, it dos learners to know how to get information effectively in a limited cadence.It to a fault encourages test takers to read more than than academic materials involving in different bea and critically mobilise how to read deferent academic articles when they are learning. However, the questions of reading test mostly imbibe multiple choice rather than short answer. It may limit takers to telephone more or so their own opinion. For example, when testing around vocabulary, the question but gives four choices and asks examinees to choose the best one. Actually, there are alike go for a lot of words post be selected.The goal of the question Is to assess test takers about their judgment of this word. Therefore, I come back If questions may ask examinees to frame down their own words base on their comprehension that Is better. In the listening section, it involves in dialogues and academic talks. The purpose o f this section is to test listening comprehension in academic environment. In other words, it measures test takers ability of listening for basic comprehension, listening for pragmatic understanding and to connect and assent ideas presented in multiple information sources.Like reading section, the formats of questions as well as adopt various ways. Moreover, examinees note taking can be good and improved from the listening test. Dialogues and lectures talking will last more than one minute. To most of them, they cannot memorize the whole content without noting. Therefore, how to write down come across information in a limited era can be a skill for test takers who will study In an academic atmosphere. Furthermore, diverse formats provide a good opportunity for them to realize how to keep in line essential Information with recovering different ways.The speed of listening Is ruler speed and sometimes, the listening test involves in different voices of pronunciation to string test takers know and listening test as we discussed above. I think the way that listening test needs to improve is similar to reading test. It in addition means that using dependent questions replace multiple choices can be thought. Next part is speaking test. This section will test ability to communicate effectively in a variety of situations.The ability of synthesizing and summarizing what test takers perk up read in their textbooks and heard in and out of doors of the class, the skill of forming their own opinions in response to the information they set about processed, well-developed, transparent and clear idea with effective use of grammar, and good pronunciation and inflection these are main goals to assess speaking ability. The strength of this part is to combine reading with speaking and to provide opinion-based questions. Moreover, the degree of each question be time-tested is gradually harder.The topic for examinees may also from familiar to a little hard to unde rstand. In my opinion, the speaking test can be a bad section as well as a good one in TOEFL. The good way is that it not vertical evaluates speaking ability in academic way but also involves in common environment. It not just has output but stimulant first-class honours degree such as reading, and then speaking. Nevertheless, due to the test is based on Internet, that is, speaking section also needs to be tested in the computer, and it brings a problem.Compared with talking to examiners, it is not flexible. It has no communication amongst examinees and examiners. For my perspective, test takers also may feel anxiety because there has no response when hey speak and feel nervous or without good prep to speak due to time limited. The last component in TOEFL is the composing section. It measures ability to write in standard academic English. It divides into two parts interconnected make-up task and independent writing task.The goal of the first part integrated writing task asks examiners to demonstrate that they have tacit material coming from different sources (reading and listening) and to combine the information from those sources in a coherent, well organized, summarized written form to draw conclusions of the important points. The independent writing task aims to measure the students ability to state their opinions or express their comments on topics which are based on their personal knowledge and experience. In general, if test takers deficiency to get a elevateder score, they should know steps of strive and practice more in academic ways.The good thing of this TOEFL writing test is using academic materials to integrate reading and listening to write a summary. Although topic of independent writing task is not undeniable referring to academic issues, the writing steps should follow in academic steps. Moreover, owe to computer-based writing, the score is not influenced by handwriting. Nevertheless, it may also be a problem due to time limit espec ially for some plenty who are not good at typing or have not well speediness. It is a little hard to deal with bar encouraging these persons to practice more about their typing.To sum up, I think TOEFL test is a good test though it brings some contend to me. There have a lot of benefits of this test. Firstly, it ensures that test- takers are being measured objectively on the same material. The grading is standardized based on rubrics provided by TEST, so test scores are the same no matter whom or what is scoring them. Secondly, there is no age, no sexual activity and no nationality limit for taking the test. Anyone who wants to assess their English language cognitive process especially for people who need to study aboard in English feedback.When persons received their result, score will definitely appear in their paper and evaluation of each section will be provided so that examinees are able to know the strength and failing of themselves in general ways. Finally, the speaking and writing parts integrate some input tasks such as reading and listening to test rather than be measured separately. The integrated tasks may be considered more Hellenizing in the test will help learners build the confidence needed to communicate in the academic environments they plan to enter because students need to be able to combine their language skills in the classroom.Appropriate challenge will improve learners to more think about their helplessness of language learning and hence to find effective ways they can develop. However, there still have some limitations in the test. In the first place, although test takers can be offered some feedbacks from the organization, the feedbacks of scores honourable alter the degree of their performance. They cannot get more individual feedback about the strength and weakness they have according to the test. Likewise, each level still has its deviation.Even though examinees can get same level of sections for each test, they may confus e about the score why last time they can get a high score whereas this time is a low score. In the minute place, I feel the time arrangement also has its problem. In general, the test will last three hours at least but Just ten minutes for break from morning to afternoon. For many test takers, the time may make them feel exhausted and influence their performance more or less. In the third place, the procedure of the test may also have its weakness.In order to avoid cheating in the test, examiners require learners to answer extra section such as reading or listening based on different individuals randomly. Hence, it will result in the time of speaking section beginning different. It is unfair to the individuals who are doing speaking primarily while others who are still doing reading or listening part can have a chance to listen others speaking and have more time to prepare during the break. The final point I want to mention is that there have a lot of test supply for each section test.Learners will make more focus on searching or studying methods in order to get a higher score rather than improve their language ability. As we discussed above the limitation, not all can get right solution. But I think we still are able to find some ways to improve. Firstly, the examiners can provide rubrics of each specific score for test takers or else of the level of performance. That is, I think they need to list more details of each point and make learners more better understanding about why they can get this point and why they cannot get. The feedback should mainly devise individuals strength and weakness instead of general errors.The general problem also can be placed in the reflection but not in the domain way. Secondly, when talking about dealing with the procedure, I think administers may provide another place for test takers about test speaking. In other words, when finishing their reading and listening part, examiners need to go the place which dedicated to spea king test after having a rest. Finally, due to various test preparation, in my opinion, I believe that form of variegation can be a good way to assess. For example, applying more open questions instead of multiple choices may be helpful for improving learners high order thinking.