.

Monday, February 4, 2019

Comparing the Use of Language in Titus Andronicus and Hamlet Essay

Comparing the Use of quarrel in Titus Andronicus and Hamlet As characters of high birth and important governmental positions, Titus and Hamlet are necessarily observed closely by those about them for their reaction to the tragic events that have taken in place in their lives and it is primarily the unique language with which they express their grief and anger that disconcerts both(prenominal) their enemies and their friends, and keeps them under an exacting scrutiny for the duration of their eponymous plays. The other characters in Titus Andronicus and Hamlet interpret the language of these tragic heroes, the devices it employs, the lack of decorum it exhibits, as the symptom of madness. It is a language born out of suffering and crafted by intelligence and insight, and, above all, a desire to push language to its communicative limit, and as such, a language that characters like Marcus, Tamora, Polonius, Horatio, and Gertrude cannot appreciate, and are quick to pock madness. A nd yet there is also a sense in which this circumstance in not wholly inapplicable, for, as these plays demonstrate, there is a o.k. line between poetry and madness. The language of the principal characters in Titus Andronicus is fraught(p) with poetic devices, such as allusion to classical mythology and extended similes, many of which are in the heroic style of Virgil and Homer and appropriate classical themes. Titus compares his recollect to Rome with the bark that hath discharged his fraught/ and returns with precious lading to the bespeak/ from whence at first she weighed her anchorage and voices a desire that the virtues of Romes new-fangled leader, Saturninus, will reflect on Rome as Titans rays on commonwealth (I.i.71-73, I.i.225-226). Lucius describes the bodies of his dead broth... ...ft, Horatio. The funeral baked meats/Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables, therefrom realizing, through language, all of the implications of such a union of opposites (I.ii.18 0-1). Titus is also the alin concert character in his play to make full sense of its themes-through the devices of metaphor, which yokes together seemingly disparate aspects of life, and the device of metonymy, which pares people and concepts down to their very essence, he comes to an understanding of the true nature of violence, grief, and revenge. Works CitedKurmode, Frank. Shakespeares Language. The Penguin Group. London, 2000Shakespeare, William. Titus Andronicus. Ed. Eugene M. Waith. Oxford Oxford University Press, 1998. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Literature Reading Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. fifth ed. Ed. Robert DiYanni. New York McGraw-Hill. 2002.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.