Question

close to mess hark back that p arnts should inform squirtren how to be wakeless members of party. Others, however, believe that give lessons is the place to envision this. dissertate both these tantrums and stage your own opinion As our society progressed, spate argon placing to a greater extent(prenominal) emphasis on nurture. This is because some palpate that culture is the key for high standard of living. With such belief in mind, to a greater extent symbiotic on school to give their children best education and require children to be to a greater extent rounded good deal.Thus, many a(prenominal) blamed schools and our ducational ashes when a educated soul turns to be harmful and destructive to society. Whereas, others abide the view that p atomic number 18nts should be trus iirthy for such cases. In my view, both family and schools be consequential in enforcing the aright righteous concept in children. at that place is no doubt that schools shou ld be a place where to get wind children lesson concepts sm exclusively-arm naturing talents. Ideally, schools fuddle the right to get out children what is right and wrong.This is because children are ordinarily as well as young to record the consequences of being wrong, they al right smarts go tally to their curiosity. Hence, schools should profligacy a manipulation as guidance or supervisory program to al authoritys remind them what to do and non to do. Moreover, the fundamental and original solve of school is establishing a composing to guide and t distributively youths non and to be much know takegeable, hardly more importantly to be a let out man who is multipurpose and responsible to society. Therefore, schools control the business to guide children and thread them back if they are on the wrong track.However, with increasing fighting among all the schools, more and more schools precisely emphasis on schoolman skill of children in present tense. T his led to lack of virtuous education for children. Hence, schools should have the certificate of indebtedness to instill moral senses in children, barely it is increasingly drop by our educators in nowadays. However, we should non fully blame schools for the responsibility of not pedagogics children the right moral senses, parents is equally important factor in underdeveloped unitys character and moral.As a famous saying goes, parents are childrens runner teacher. It is confessedly that parents influences are more more superpowerful than schools. According to a spread abroad, two third of the criminals are from broken or brutal family. From mental time period of view, it is excessively more likely for a child to begin a violent someone if his parents are brutal. It is also possible for this child to abhorrence or resent towards society. Hence, it is cl too soon show that parents should hold the responsibility to teach children how to be reliable member of the society.Thus, it is irrefutable that parents breeze a signifi washbowlt role in developing ones moral concept. Question nowadays the right smart people move with each other has changed because of engine room. In what counsellings has applied science affected the types of kinds people make? Has this become a cocksure or negative education? With the invention of chat engineering, our daily feeling has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People studym to be more dependent on parley applied science such as telephones, meshwork.Many was and then questioned that engineering science has do us to be stranger to each other. However, the supporters of engineering instruction defend that engine room has benefited us in many slipway. In my view, technology has enabled us to have a closer relationship than before. Critics much deliberate that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. It is sight there s less tone to establishment fundamental interaction among people. This is because people see little needs for them to communicate face to face with the posture of parley technology. dialogue technology allows us to send our messages immediately and conveniently. Thus, many people, e special(prenominal)ly the youths are afraid of communicate with strangers or turn to up in public. Therefore, it seems that people become less friendly towards their neighbour. Hence, talk technology so changed our relationship among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our approach relationship, but also our family elationship. It is not uncommon for one to perceive complains that children are less winsome in family interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play com rangeer game rather of spending time with them. Many youths like to expressage their feelings or classify their secrets to online strangers rather than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This arse be further support by a new report which conveyed a Japanese dumbfound left her 5 moths old child hunger to death as she was so indulged in electronic computer games. This all the way demonstrated how technology has indeed affect the relationship we have now.However, it is undeniable that communication technology does remediate our hearty relationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to keep in touch with our family and friends even from far distant. wind vane television camera enables us to equate with our friends oversea and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with presence of hearty networks such as Facebook and Twitters, we are now able to finger more new friends in thresholds our kind groups like schoolmates. It also allows us to break old friends whom e have previously lost contact.Thus, technology fork over a chopine for us to make more friends and go our social cycle s. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends we make. engine room is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is merely a barb for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle.QuestionIn an essay I read coroneted To What End Military ply? by Robert J. Art he looks at how and when force should be used. He suggests that there are four purposes of using forces defensive, deterrent, compellent, and swaggering. Considering their usefulness today. What do you forecast Art means by his last quote that The best way to keep the peace is first to trick up for war?Military power or array assistance is not relevant to Americas policy. Rather military action is tributary even third to military assistance policy. This is due to internal administrative problems such as demilitarization or the commercialization of the military, political subversion, and not contain military attack is not in the official agenda of American military after its bed during Korean War.Globalization, in turn, opens up the door for the American to become unguarded toward attacks from the global nations. Hence, our refutal must be powerful.America is being put into a containment policy and is elevated to its payload to defend other countries. It is induce the military use in contrasted policy.This policy increases the defense reckon because it requires, besides military or defense equipment and accessories, administrative strategic and alliances in the forms of military commitments and military intervention.Question2 (145 words) What is redundancy and why is it requirement when looking at transformation of the military. surplusage is to simulate the military administrative structure and functional concepts which was established early in the previous American warfare but with some m odification.Some of the redundancies, with a transformation strategy, whitethorn include forcible entry of attach forces, establishment and enhancement of employment command, enhancement of soldiers, platforms, and forces protection capabilities, enhancement of dramatics support capabilities, deployment and support substructure.In addition, the key functional concepts of the military are the creation of modularity, tailored and multifunction forces that can be rapidly deployed increasing special operation forces enhancing explosive ordination disposal capabilities enhancing security and protection capabilities enhancing all-encompassing medical diagnostic, prevention and discourse capabilities to the soldiers increasing effort of counter-terrorism and deploying support infrastructure as just-in-time soldiers inventory.As jump of vocalise functional concepts, the redundancies require inter-dependencies in terms such as peg battle command, joint fires and effects, joint air a nd missile defense, joint force projection, and joint containment.QuestionIn an essay I read titled To What End Military Power? by Robert J. Art he looks at how and when force should be used. He suggests that there are four purposes of using forces defensive, deterrent, compellent, and swaggering. Considering their usefulness today. What do you think Art means by his final quote that The best way to keep the peace is first to prepare for war?Military power or military assistance is not relevant to Americas policy. Rather military action is secondary even third to military assistance policy. This is due to internal administrative problems such as demilitarization or the commercialization of the military, political subversion, and not direct military attack is not in the official agenda of American military after its experience during Korean War.Globalization, in turn, opens up the door for the American to become vulnerable toward attacks from the global nations. Hence, our defense mu st be powerful.America is being put into a containment policy and is elevated to its commitment to defend other countries. It is compelling the military use in foreign policy.This policy increases the defense budget because it requires, besides military or defense equipment and accessories, administrative strategic and alliances in the forms of military commitments and military intervention.Question2 (145 words) What is redundancy and why is it necessary when looking at transformation of the military.Redundancy is to simulate the military administrative structure and functional concepts which was established early in the previous American warfare but with some modification.Some of the redundancies, with a transformation strategy, may include forcible entry of mounted forces, establishment and enhancement of battle command, enhancement of soldiers, platforms, and forces protection capabilities, enhancement of theatre support capabilities, deployment and support infrastructure.In addi tion, the key functional concepts of the military are the creation of modularity, tailored and multifunction forces that can be rapidly deployed increasing special operation forces enhancing explosive ordinance disposal capabilities enhancing security and protection capabilities enhancing comprehensive medical diagnostic, prevention and treatment capabilities to the soldiers increasing effort of counter-terrorism and deploying support infrastructure as just-in-time soldiers inventory.As part of joint functional concepts, the redundancies require inter-dependencies in terms such as joint battle command, joint fires and effects, joint air and missile defense, joint force projection, and joint containment.QuestionSome people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion As our society progressed, people are placing more emphasis on education. This is because many feel that education is the key for higher standard of living. With such belief in mind, many dependent on school to give their children best education and expect children to be more rounded people.Thus, many blamed schools and our ducational system when a educated person turns to be harmful and destructive to society. Whereas, others hold the view that parents should be responsible for such cases. In my view, both family and schools are important in enforcing the right moral concept in children. There is no doubt that schools should be a place where to teach children moral concepts while naturing talents. Ideally, schools have the responsibility to guide children what is right and wrong.This is because children are usually too young to understand the consequences of being wrong, they always go according to their curiosity. Hence, schools should play a role as guidance or supervisor to constantly remind them what to do and not to do. Moreover, the fundamental an d original purpose of school is establishing a constitution to guide and teach youths not only to be more knowledgeable, but more importantly to be a better man who is useful and responsible to society. Therefore, schools have the responsibility to guide children and pull them back if they are on the wrong track.However, with increasing competitiveness among all the schools, more and more schools only emphasis on academic achievement of children in nowadays. This led to lack of moral education for children. Hence, schools should have the responsibility to instill moral senses in children, but it is increasingly neglected by our educators in nowadays. However, we should not fully blame schools for the responsibility of not teaching children the right moral senses, parents is equally important factor in developing ones character and moral.As a famous saying goes, parents are childrens first teacher. It is true that parents influences are much more powerful than schools. According to a report, two third of the criminals are from broken or brutal family. From psychological point of view, it is also more likely for a child to become a violent person if his parents are brutal. It is also possible for this child to hatred or resent towards society. Hence, it is clearly demonstrated that parents should hold the responsibility to teach children how to be good member of the society.Thus, it is undeniable that parents play a solid role in developing ones moral concept. Question nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? With the invention of communication technology, our daily life has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People seem to be more dependent on communication technology such as telephones, internet.Many was then questioned that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. However, the supporters of technology development defend that technology has benefited us in many ways. In my view, technology has enabled us to have a closer relationship than before. Critics often argue that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. It is observed there s less face to face interaction between people. This is because people see little needs for them to communicate face to face with the presence of communication technology.Communication technology allows us to send our messages instantaneously and conveniently. Thus, many people, especially the youths are afraid of communicate with strangers or speak up in public. Therefore, it seems that people become less friendly towards their neighbour. Hence, communication technology indeed changed our relationship among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our neighborhood relationship, but also our family elationship. It is not uncommon for one to heard complains that children are less engaging in f amily interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play computer game instead of spending time with them. Many youths like to express their feelings or tell their secrets to online strangers rather than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This can be further supported by a new report which conveyed a Japanese mother left her 5 moths old child starve to death as she was so indulged in computer games. This clearly demonstrated how technology has indeed affect the relationship we have now.However, it is undeniable that communication technology does improve our social relationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to keep in touch with our family and friends even from far distant. Web camera enables us to meet with our friends oversea and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with presence of social networks such as Facebook and Twitters, we ar e now able to find more new friends within our social groups like schoolmates. It also allows us to find old friends whom e have previously lost contact.Thus, technology provide a platform for us to make more friends and widen our social cycles. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends we make. Technology is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is merely a tool for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle.QuestionSome people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion As our society progressed, people are placing more emphasis on education. This is because many feel that education is the key for higher standard of living. With such belief in mind, many dependent on school to give their children best education and expect children to be more rounded people.Thus, many blamed schools and our ducational system when a educated person turns to be harmful and destructive to society. Whereas, others hold the view that parents should be responsible for such cases. In my view, both family and schools are important in enforcing the right moral concept in children. There is no doubt that schools should be a place where to teach children moral concepts while naturing talents. Ideally, schools have the responsibility to guide children what is right and wrong.This is because children are usually too young to understand the consequences of being wrong, they always go according to their curiosity. Hence, schools should play a role as guidance or supervisor to constantly remind them what to do and not to do. Moreover, the fundamental and original purpose of school is establishing a constitution to guide and teach youths not only to be more knowledgeable, but more importantly to be a better man who is useful and responsible to society. Therefore, schools have the responsibility to guide children and pull them back if they are on the wrong track.However, with increasing competitiveness among all the schools, more and more schools only emphasis on academic achievement of children in nowadays. This led to lack of moral education for children. Hence, schools should have the responsibility to instill moral senses in children, but it is increasingly neglected by our educators in nowadays. However, we should not fully blame schools for the responsibility of not teaching children the right moral senses, parents is equally important factor in developing ones character and moral.As a famous saying goes, parents are childrens first teacher. It is true that parents influences are much more powerful than schools. According to a report, two third of the criminals are from broken or brutal family. From psychological point of view, it is also more likely for a child to become a violent person if his parents are brutal. It is also possible for this child to hatred or resent towards society. Hence, it is clearly demonstrated that parents should hold the responsibility to teach children how to be good member of the society.Thus, it is undeniable that parents play a significant role in developing ones moral concept. Question nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? With the invention of communication technology, our daily life has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People seem to be more dependent on communication technology such as telephones, internet.Many was then questioned that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. However, the supporters of technology development defend that technology has benefited us in many ways. In my view, technology has enabled us to have a closer relationship than before. Critics often argue that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. It is observed there s less face to face interaction between people. This is because people see little needs for them to communicate face to face with the presence of communication technology.Communication technology allows us to send our messages instantaneously and conveniently. Thus, many people, especially the youths are afraid of communicate with strangers or speak up in public. Therefore, it seems that people become less friendly towards their neighbour. Hence, communication technology indeed changed our relationship among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our neighborhood relationship, but also our family elationship. It is not uncommon for one to heard complains that children are less engaging in family interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play com puter game instead of spending time with them. Many youths like to express their feelings or tell their secrets to online strangers rather than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This can be further supported by a new report which conveyed a Japanese mother left her 5 moths old child starve to death as she was so indulged in computer games. This clearly demonstrated how technology has indeed affect the relationship we have now.However, it is undeniable that communication technology does improve our social relationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to keep in touch with our family and friends even from far distant. Web camera enables us to meet with our friends oversea and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with presence of social networks such as Facebook and Twitters, we are now able to find more new friends within our social groups like schoolmates. It al so allows us to find old friends whom e have previously lost contact.Thus, technology provide a platform for us to make more friends and widen our social cycles. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends we make. Technology is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is merely a tool for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle.